I'm no pro, but for me, it's entirely situational. If I think I can get a guy to bite on an overbet, I'll do it since it's all about the EV$. If there's an 90% chance, he calls a 1/2 pot bet for $50 and a 30% chance he calls an overbet of $200, I'm better off taking my chances with the big bet.
It's also pretty confusing when you shove a monster. I flopped kings full the other night and re-raised a flop bet all-in. The guy called with TPTK and proceeded to howl about how lousy I played it. "But you called me." I thought. "So was it really that bad?" Sometimes the smooth call causes more concern than the shove...from your opponent's perspective. Again, though, it's situational. I had seen him get it all in with TPTK on the flop earlier.
10/19/07
Anonymous
says
I'm no pro either but I would agree that all depends on the cards at that moment. Sometimes, you can bluff them by not bluffing if you know what I mean. I like to hear about these kind of scenarios so keep them coming.
Cheers
10/19/07
I use it and have noticed that people use it w/ made hands on 3 suited flops. In fact, I tried to create a theorum about it here.
Landlord Theorum
10/19/07
Thanks for the input guys! I should have explained a little more. I have seen people use it almost as a strategy starting in the early levels of tournament play. Like betting $250 into a $100 pot on the flop without a scary board. I understand protecting your hand, and making the huge over-bet when you have the nuts with the hopes of a call. This is something more of aggressive style designed to tilt people into calling later hands when they do have the nuts. Has anyone else seen this?
10/19/07